Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Training, Page 21 Reviews

.

Done it once. Could not see the point of doing a refesher

a total waste of my time to be told how to treat people in the motor industry

No summary provided

The on line learning is i find difficult I am not used to it. I prefer the old methods. I couldnt stop the presenter and ask a question or re empasis points. Not happy with this atall

I felt the concepts were good as an introduction to the subject, but the examples were very few, obvious and simplistic, and did not reflect real-life situations which are often much more subtle and it might be very easy to unwittingly discriminate. The last training I did was better in highlighting that equality does not mean the same exact treatment for everyone, but a fair treatment that allows for difference, with examples to illustrate this. This was referred to in the test at the end, without having been adequately discussed in the training itself I felt. The benefits of a workplace with good equality and diversity attitudes were stated (and seem obvious as the right thing to aim for) but there was no evidence or statistics given to back up these statement.

Superficial, prescriptive in approach.Do not agree with definition of 'harrassment' (where is the element of repetition?).Course did not deal with making 'reasonable accomodation' but it came up in the questions.

How is it proven that a team of people with different races / religions is more proactive / happier than a team of one race / religion? it is completely up to the laziness and proactiveness of each individual regardless of race or religion that question / answer is a complete nonsense type of question - If anything it shows the company is more diverse and reputable when employing people. There is a few other questions on the test which are also similar and not very well put together.

Another tick box training course.

No summary provided