Environmental Awareness Training, Page 13 Reviews

Lots of repetition very slow delivery and obvious points made

Course itself is ok, but there are too many technical errors in the course. Luckily possible to progress even though there are errors

So boring. Too long.

This course is very useful but I feel the questions were not hard enough and didn't challenge you. the majority of them could be answered by anyone with common sense and deduction of the wrong answers.

Pro Green Party anti-Trump propaganda. Although no American accents. Boundary conditions of examples not consistent - all UK waste 100 million tonnes and then the building industry also produces 100 million tonnes of waste?

Expecting one to memorise a load of spurious stats doesn't seem a very good use of one's time. I understand very well how the environment works and my effect upon it, but knowing how many tonnes of CO2 are generated by a 2 degree C increase in office temp (above ambient I assume otherwise this is a nonsense question), does not help me in any way shape or form.Nevertheless if we were able to just skip this whole interminable set of videos (or have a full text option that doesn't even attempt to play the videos) and take the test then that would be an improvement.As an aside, oil coal and gas are perfectly renewable provided you have enough time (a few hundred million years should do it) 😉.

Most questions at end check that you have done the course, which is as it should be. Employees need a basis awareness after all of the need to reuse, reduce and recycle. However there are a few which rely on you having learnt by heart some numbers which is just pointless. Mostly you can guess by picking the biggest which is usually correct (though not always as I discovered). There are others I would take issue with eg 'what was created in 1996, pick one of 3 - how does this further anything?

Thought that a lot of the information presented was well known already

...

Majority is common sense and you felt like you wished it would hurry up and finish. Being tested on how much hot air can fill a hot air balloon if the heat in the office is increased by two degrees is pretty irrelevant. The message is that it is bad, being tested on a method of demonstrating the quantity is not a good question. You might as well have said the answer is the amount of heat generated by how many 3kw kettles in a 6 month period if you only boiled 200ml twice a day and only on Thursdays and Fridays during alternate weeks. Give an actual figure.