Environmental Awareness Training, Page 14 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.5

3844 reviews

  • 72% 5
  • 12% 4
  • 7% 3
  • 4% 2
  • 4% 1
Too long and full of common knowledge

No summary provided

2/5
Tedious but nescessary

I found the continuous repetition irritating but am sure it is nescessary to get the importance of the subject into our heads.

2/5
Too easy.

No summary provided

2/5
Frustrating

The videos kept lagging and the answers wouldn't log or take a long time to select. I'm sure it was your system and not the internet connection

2/5
Needs to be reviewed by a scientist.

The constant tendency to confuse the terms "carbon" and "carbon dioxide" was an irritation (carbon dioxide is the greenhouse gas produced by burning carbon; unburnt carbon is not a greenhouse gas). At least one of the test questions had no meaning (How much [something] do we produce...?) as it didn't specify whether it meant "we" as individuals, or the whole country, or the whole world. Talking of volumes of gas (e.g. enough to fill a hot air balloon) is also meaningless unless you specify the pressure (presumably atmospheric pressure in this case). While the overall thrust of the course is absolutely correct, the scientific inaccuracies really need to be addressed. I personally found the patronising tone of the presenter irritating, and the whole course contained considerable repetition and padding. However, I guess the course gets enough of the message over to enough people to be worthwhile.

2/5
Fairly helpful

Not bad for general awareness raising. Not much depth beyond that

2/5
logged out tried log back in but unable

logged out to do something else when i tried to log back in to take the test again i was locked out

2/5
Patronising and childish delivery.

I would expect to see information delivered in this manner to year 6 students, not people in a work place. The information is of a very basic level and does not inspire thought or action. The test questions are purely testing comprehension rather than understanding and digestion of information.

2/5
Dont use trick questions

The video crashed part way through and came on again at the end. Fortunately I was using subtitles anyway. Volume of presentation was appalling compared to previous. I had volume on full and still barely heard anything with my earphones. Tests had trick questions this is a poor way to test people. Test on knowledge only not by confusing with similar wording

2/5

Ready to get started?