Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Training, Page 26 Reviews
We ask our users to rate and review our Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Training course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...
Average score 4.5
9532 reviews
Most of the videos did not work. I read all the transcripts instead. It does not seem to be possible to go back to the material once the course is completed, which is unhelpful.
No summary provided
I travel to London once every three months for two hours. Whilst there I sit on a small committee and give out shed loads of money to worthy causes. I then go home again. I have just sat through 68 small video clips and taken two exams none of which are relevant to what I do.
need to do the training again due to not having sound on my computer
The video said we must accept other beliefs and welcome them and showed a hammer and sickle Communist symbol. Around 94 million people died at the hands of Communism. No where in the video did it say about accepting political ideologies, so the hammer and sickle is pointless anyway.
Don't believe this course is necessary for someone who doesn't discriminate against anyone or anything.
Not sure the method of training is suitable for the subject. Should be done in small groups with a person rather than an on-line style course. Feels like a box ticking exercise.
Kept freezing so had to skip large parts and and some of the content would not even play at all Skipped to test
Many of the Videos do not play. this has been tested with a range of different pcs and laptops over different site and by different people. I would say about 1/2 of the videos just will not load. though you can still read the subtitles to the side if you feel you must do this course.
Why is there so much emphasis on the learner knowing the correct terminology? Surely the main thing is the learner understands and can identify what constitutes harassments, bullying etc. Why is it important to know it is direct or indirect? If the employee recognises an act, comment or procedure is not lawful or correct - then that is the main objective achieved. I could hardly decipher some of the questions as they are so ambiguously phrased. Consequently, I failed to again 80% to pass the test. Given this was my only free time to sit it and it is Good Friday at 6.30 pm, I am unlikely to rush back to try again.