Environmental Awareness Training Reviews

by allowing the option to print the certificate!! It was also a bit slow

More knowledge is needed like for eating meat the information is untrue that you provide more information should be in how many aeroplanes are in the sky each day also do you know one wild goose has the same carbon footprint then a patio heater running for a month

It’s very interesting but too many figures. You need to cater for people who cannot retain figures especially in their autumn years ie in the menopause. The course kept freezing and the course length is very economical, it’s took alot longer than 48 minutes.

Not well suited to construction or manufacturing. Not enough focus on pollution prevention or waste legislation (avoiding pollution incidents, spill control, or Duty of Care requirements for waste for example). Also FSC is not the only source of responsibly sourced timber, must also reference PEFC and Grown in Britain.

The "butterfly effect" is completely misunderstood, and is irrelevant to our personal environmental responsibility.Making it a core image and theme of the training is silly.Also, the questions at the end are inane. How long does it take to produce your own weight in waste? Is it 6 or 7 weeks? It's not really significantly different, and getting the answer wrong doesn't mean anything.

No summary provided

Apart from a few specific statistics, the course doesn't really teach anything that most people with some environmental awareness doesn't already know. Rather a lot of statements of the obvious really. Still, if it raises some awareness, that can't be bad.

as above, some questions were impossible to answer appropriately. Only factual information should be included.

Reference to plastic straws etc, ICE vehicles and no mention of EVs. Feels like the course needs a slight update to bring it in line with most recent developments and conventions.

No summary provided