GDPR EU Training, Page 5 Reviews

As a driver, I feel that other than being informative the course is of no relevance to my professional vocation.

Questions and answers are not well translated and due poor translation, some answers and/or questions have a changed sense. And a Training for German citizens should not ask for authorities in the UK.Thomson Reuters training for competition law at KUBOTA was like a training should be made.

The presenters were very patronising, in their tone of voice and delivery. In the end I just read the transcript because they were so irritating and the images did not help me to understand what they were saying or add to the content in the transcript. The content was very general and a lot of it was irrelevant to my job (I teach in a secondary school). The test questions did not really test my understanding of my responsibilities with respect to GDPR. They tested things like whether I could remember the exact fine a company can get, it doesn't matter whether I can remember the exact fine as long as I know it is very big and not knowing how much the fine is does not mean I can't use and protect data properly. Knowing the name of the government body responsible for GDPR or knowing the job title of a person in a company who is responsible for GDPR also does not help me to understand my responsibilities in my job. Overall, I felt I did not learn a lot that was relevant to my job and I was not tested on my responsibilities. The information was more useful to me as a person whose data is used by companies than as a person who sometimes processes exam and test results data. If you are selling this training to schools a being a useful thing for teachers to do you are mis-selling it. I feel like my time has been wasted here. Finally, you are making me put my name to this feedback. Does GDPR mean I should have the right to anonymous feedback?

No summary provided

No summary provided

The test crashed on the last question and I am unable to get in to try and finish it without listening to the whole programme again.

No summary provided

Not really relevant to my job

Largely commonsense; I think a glossary of terminology would have been better

I couldn't go back to redo the test