Environmental Awareness Training, Page 11 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.5

3900 reviews

  • 73% 5
  • 12% 4
  • 7% 3
  • 4% 2
  • 4% 1
Very basic

Very basic test. Didn't like the content which was suggesting everyone should give up meat! Maybe this test would be better targeting supermarkets and their high prices on foods that would be better for the environment.

1/5
Indoctrination Training

This Review makes the assumption (unproven) that climate change is totally anthropomorphic (human caused). However data for the past 25 years shows absolutely no global warming. This "Training" isn't so much about training as it is indoctrination

1/5
Politically Correct

No summary provided

1/5
horrendous, no next button!

It is horrendous, there is no next button! I can read the transcript in a fraction of the time it is spoken at me in the video. And if the window logs out, you have to watch that video again!This is a infuriating change from previous courses and I only hope this has been reverted/rectified before I have to do another course like this!Even though I wholehearted agree with the recommended actions, it is patronising, preachy and long winded. Given the 48 minutes it takes to watch the videos and 100,000 people are estimated to take this course this year, that has the net outcome of simply wasting 4,800,000 minutes of time this year.

1/5
Too long

Tooooooo loooooong

1/5
Takes far too long

Takes far too long to watch all the content and seems like it's aimed at primary school children. Much better if the test could be taken upfront and learning requirements identified off the back of the results.

1/5
Rubbish

Preachy, opinions expressed as fact, total waste of 48 minutes. Think how much time, money and energy could be saved by stripping this back to real facts.

1/5
Factually incorrect

It is stated in the video that phone chargers etc, draw electricity whilst plugged in but not in use. This is not correct. The energy drawn by these and similar devices is absolutely insignificant, less than £0.10 worth per year! By telling people that this is a meaningful difference, they may think that they have made a worthy effort, and that they do not need to make other changes in their life. Furthermore, it erodes confidence in other facts stated in the video, which are broadly correct.Please change your video to show the actual impact of suggested lifestyle changes, in units that can be compared easily to each other i.e kg of CO2 equivalent saving per year. This way, people will not unplug their phone chargers, and think that is a comparable saving to changes that are actually meaningful such as less commuting, reducing meat consumption, etc.

1/5
Patronising and some debatable claims

No summary provided

1/5
useless

No summary provided

1/5

Ready to get started?