Working at Height Training, Page 5 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.7

3130 reviews

  • 82% 5
  • 11% 4
  • 4% 3
  • 1% 2
  • 2% 1
?

No summary provided

1/5
Poor translation

When using other language then English, translation is very poor to understand the questions. That was why I didn’t pass in the first time and had to repeat the test in English.

1/5
Video not covering relavent topics or ad

Presentation doesnt play Insufficient information given by video for completing test

1/5
Completely unnecessary

I have both a ladder and a low level tower erection certificate, both in date, and although what has been shown was almost 100% correct in the way it was presented, I take issue with this course existing altogether. One should simply not be contemplating using any method for working at height if they have not completed a valid course for doing so. This course has not made me a certified or competent user or inspector of any working at height equipment, nor does it anybody else who completes it. I certainly hope that this does not make people falsely think that they are now adequately qualified to perform any such task as demonstrated in the videos.

1/5
none

No summary provided

1/5
theory...

will not give a practise..

1/5
Common sense really.

That's 40 minutes of my life i'm never going to get back. On the plus side, I got to sit down and do nothing for 40 minutes while at work. Good catch up on facebook and a laugh with the girls in the salesoffice. Can't believe that companies are prepared to pay for their employees to sit and waste so much time.

1/5
absolutely no relevance to me and my wor

No idea why I was made to do this course, waste of time and money

1/5
Patronising, dull, irrelevant.

No summary provided

1/5
Thoroughly boring

The training had a monotone narrator the videos were tedious and the exam system required no actual learning to pass. It requires only common sense. Perhaps gauging the questions to be a little bit tougher. This may prompt personnel to pay more attention to the learning narrative. Thanks

1/5

Ready to get started?