Loading reviews…

laborious format and ambiguous questions

Two points 1. Format I found it really tedious to click through 30 second -1m videos, everyone works differently and perhaps you've had feedback to the contrary in the past that information is better processed in these bitesize chunks. I would like to suggest an option of smaller or larger video viewing be permitted to allow users to make best use of their personal learning styles. 2. Test One of the questions asked about avoiding irrelevant future works, it felt like the wording was confusing in relation (I think) to what plans should include – it also referenced prior works which to my mind shouldn't be included in plans which should relate to what is going to occur and not what has already happened – could this be reworded/considered? Some points discussed in the video are not explicitly referenced in the HSE CDM 2015 legislation – in particular in relation to expectations/requirements between clients and designers, is this implied

good

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

easily followed and digested

informative and well presented.

very good

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Good

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Good.

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Good Course into the CDM Regulations

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Well presented course.

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Comprhensive, to the point

This user gave this course a rating of 5/5 stars

Good Course/Construction Company nah

I get the whole health and safety video relating to signage, planning, in events of emergency buy all means which is all good but I do not like and how it was all based on a Construction Company which I felt was pointless and irrelevant to certain aspects. if it was based on a Waste Removal Specialist Contratcors like MTS then this would of got 4-5 Stars.