Environmental Awareness Training, Page 7 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.5

3829 reviews

  • 72% 5
  • 12% 4
  • 7% 3
  • 4% 2
  • 4% 1
Tedious, nothing new.

It would be nice if you could skip the videos. Certainly once through is fine, but I have done this again by playing the videos with the sound off whilst doing other work. It shows me nothing new. Not only this but there is a need for some proof reading of questions, e.g. "Less cars" should read "Fewer cars".Sorry, but this is a tick box to be done, not training to enhance staff knowledge.

2/5
Unnecessarily long

Felt a bit long, but it is an important subject. There was a typo in the tree question 'Breath'. Too many questions involving random statistics and not actual principles of green living.

2/5
Inaccuracies abound

Far too many generalisations (animal farming is bad for the environment, we should all stop eating meat, overgrazing is destroying the planet) I am an adult, not a clueless idealistic teenager who is fresh out of school Some fair points about social and corporate responsibilities around waste management but tainted with ill informed and emotive green issue posturing

2/5
Very long winded

Long drawn out videos that could be easily condensed, also some of the questions were oddly specific and tricky.

2/5
Extremely patronising

No summary provided

2/5
Bit hard going

Found the environment training a bit hard to keep focused. As I felt it was telling us information which is already being forced on us though TV, onsite, and all over social media. It was a bit yeah yeah here we go again feeling. But maybe it was just me.

2/5
Too long and repetitive

No summary provided

2/5
A different flavour

This course has a different flavour to the others. It was full of percentages and figures, which appeared to culminate in a guessing game of sorts during the test. It felt highly political and an air of fearmongering about it all. For example, 'Bottled water, manufacturing-chemical surplus can affect hormones' is rather general and such statements do not really link with how many trees equate to how many people can breathe for two years. I have had no problems passing the other courses, but I lost interest, so much so I failed this one and had to re-do it. Hope helpful.

2/5
Patronising tone -some content dubious

Stick to facts - which are useful and informative. The tone was patronising, the presentation was school teacher-ish and aimed at a more juvenile audience. Extremely off-putting, especially for people who already have some knowledge and awareness but who want to apply this in the work setting. Some content just not appropriate for work-based training. It is intrusive and impertinent in this context to lecture people about their diet and consumption of meat & dairy. It crossed a boundary into dubious 'received wisdom' about diet and meat & dairy production. Note - I have been a vegetarian for my whole life.

2/5
Long winded , padded out

No summary provided

2/5

Ready to get started?