Bullying & Harassment Training, Page 2 Reviews

We ask our users to rate and review our course immediately after they've completed their training. Here's what people are saying...

USER REVIEWS

Average score 4.8

1616 reviews

  • 85% 5
  • 10% 4
  • 4% 3
  • 1% 2
  • 1% 1
reads as a racist video

I don't feel really appropriate to the theme of the course to perpetuate the black angry woman stereotype showing her as the bully, while showing a white male man as the victim. Frankly is quite disgusting when is normally the other way round. Also, it may not be, but the actor chosen to represent race discrimination, reads as white, with again a black woman being the one doing the harassment. Really, in 2022?? I lost interest in anything that this video could show me as clearly whoever decided on the casting , etc, should probably do training themselves.

1/5
Not engaging, too many stop starts...

Would be better to break the test and do it in parts after each section... some of the videos are drawn out and don't really get to the point!

1/5
Terribly out of touch

It is inconsistent and quite patronizing.There's also seems to be a mistake in what is defined as bullying vs harrasement.As far as i am aware, obeisity can be a disability as defined under the equality act of 2010.I would expect a bit more from a course like this as i very much felt like it was being explained to school kids

1/5
unrealistic

No summary provided

1/5
Simplistic and patronising.

No summary provided

1/5
I will keep trying to complete these cou

Does this apply to being sexually harassed at work by mentally unwell people. Are learning disabilities and autism, and mental health people allowed to do this by law??? This has flagged up some questions about what happens in the work place.

1/5
too basic.

Done it once. Could not see the point of doing a refesher

1/5
Inadvertantly empowering rascists

I was very concerned that you decided to portray a black woman as the bully of a white man. Your video states that she is a bully if she makes him feel uncomfortable. The video then advises that this is the case even if she is not intending harm, or says she is the victim. The sub-text is that, if a person of colour makes a white person uncomfortable, regardless of what they have experienced, then they are the "bad guy". I feel that this message, although unintentional, is actively harmful.The obvious scenario: a black woman expereinces rascism from a white man and tells him so, which causes him to feel concerned about potentially facing repercussions. Your video states that in this scenario she is the bully, and he the victim. That is clearly not the correct conclusion.This narrative is commonly used by rascists to avoid being challenged, twisting a valid complaint to "If you're saying that this is about race, then you're the real rascist". It's very damaging because it makes it harder for people to speak out against rascism, and supports those who wish to continue to harass without consequences. I'm sure this was not your intention.This message was further reinforced by the section on protected characteristics, where a white man was used as an example of the "race" characteristic, protected from harassment by a black woman. This again implies support for a white person claiming harassment if a person of colour challenges them on their own or systemic rascism. I would imagine that the intention was to state that rascism is unacceptable and encourage people to challenge it. You have, however, given the opposite message.The rest of the video was of good quality, but inadvertantly empowering rascists and discouraging people who experience rascism has resulted in the poor score.

1/5
not very motivating

it sends a message of "it's not illegal if it's bullying, thus not so severe" the way i see it.

1/5
waste of time

No summary provided

1/5

Ready to get started?